Robotics paper index
Recovering Low-Bit Failures in Vision-Language-Action Policies via Quantization-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on Recovering Low-Bit Failures in Vision-Language-Action Policies via Quantization-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Quantization lowers deployment costs of vision-language-action (VLA) policies but can compromise task completion. Across five VLA models and 4,050 real-world trials, we systematically reveal that quantization-aware training (QAT) generally improves on post-training quantization (PTQ) but leaves substantial gaps to full precision (FP) on long-horizon tasks and under visual and semantic shifts, while its imitation-based objective does not explicitly use rollout success or partial completion. To exploit these outcome signals, we introduce Quantization-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning (QCRL), an offline RL method coupling progress-based advantage estimation with quantization-aware source conditioning. FP rollouts supply reference experience beyond action-level distillation, progress-scaled terminal penalty distinguishes partial completion, and quantization-aware conditioning selects advantageous reference behavior within the quantized policy. We evaluate weight-only INT4 W4A16 on $π_{0.5}$ and GR00T N1.5 and joint weight-activation NVFP4 W4A4 on $π_{0.5}$. Using only in-distribution data, QCRL reaches 99.3% of FP's mean score across three visual-shift conditions for $π_{0.5}$ with INT4 W4A16, alongside 42.9% model-memory savings. With NVFP4 W4A4, it reaches 100.7% of the same FP baseline, alongside a $1.73\times$ speedup using NVFP4/FP8 deployment. Hardware gains are relative to FP16 on Jetson Thor.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments