Robotics paper index

Spatiotemporal Agility: Time-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Guided Dynamic Quadrupedal Interception

2026-08-07 · arXiv: 2608.06907

One-line summary

A robotics research paper on Spatiotemporal Agility: Time-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Guided Dynamic Quadrupedal Interception.

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Legged robots require robust agility to perceive and interact with complex and dynamic environments within a constrained time. However, most existing quadruped locomotion works rely on velocity-tracking policy, which struggle to reach precise targets within strict temporal constraints. Moreover, integrating real-time perception with agile locomotion for highly dynamic targets remains challenging due to sensor latency and processing delays. To concretely study and benchmark such agility in dynamic settings, we introduce a challenging ball-catching task for legged robots. This paper proposes an integrated framework that combines a vision module for landing point and time prediction with a direct position and time conditioned RL locomotion policy, instead of intermediate velocity commands. Beyond the method design, this work presents a system-level contribution that completes real-time robotic interception system that integrates multi-camera perception, online trajectory prediction, low-latency target communication, and sim-to-real locomotion control into a closed-loop deployment pipeline. By explicitly predicting the future spatial-temporal target, our approach mitigates perception latency during dynamic interception. We conducted extensive ball-catching experiments for the legged robot. Through comparative experiments against a velocity-tracking baseline, our direct target-conditioned approach achieves a higher success rate in catching balls with predicted landing spots within 2 meters and flight times between 0.8 and 1.2 seconds. This shows that the robot has successfully completed the dynamic ball-catching task under our tested setup. Furthermore, our policy exhibits a smaller performance gap after deployment, suggesting improved sim-to-real behavior in these trials.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
4.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment