Robotics paper index
What Do RTL Repair Benchmarks Actually Measure?
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on What Do RTL Repair Benchmarks Actually Measure?.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充：本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
RTL repair benchmarks should measure whether a model can fix broken RTL given a specification. To this end, we construct and hash-bind RTLRepairDataset, 5,784 (broken, fixed) training pairs; RTLRepairBench, 459 held-out cases with 374 syntactic and 85 behavioral mutations; and an evaluation harness supporting simulation and formal equivalence. We then use this infrastructure to identify two measurement confounds. First, simulation and formal scoring give opposite signs for the apparent effect of providing a specification in one evaluated cohort; reset-aware rescoring attributes almost all of the simulation-formal disagreement to reset and first-cycle comparison semantics. Second, on 274 mined model failures, the specification-only minus specification-conditioned recovery point estimate ranges from -8.5 to +18.3 percentage points across six models. Thus, a conventional repair score need not isolate whether the model used the faulty RTL. We translate these findings into evaluation controls: report initialization, reset, first-cycle, and unknown-value semantics; disclose oracle coverage and undecided cases; and include a specification-only baseline. Together, the resources and audit provide both a benchmark for behavioral repair and a protocol for diagnosing what contributes to its measured score. We release the benchmark, the training set, construction code, sanitized aggregate evidence, and reproduction materials at https://github.com/Evaaaz/RTLRepairBench.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments